Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-187178

ABSTRACT

Background: The pathophysiology of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is characterized by the rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque within the coronary artery, with subsequent platelet aggregation, thrombus formation, and ischemia. Before platelets aggregate, they must first be activated to express activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors on the cell surface. This activation is the result of stimulation from endogenous platelet agonists, such as thromboxane A2 and adenosine diphosphate (ADP). ADP activates platelets by binding to P2Y12 receptors on the cell surface. Despite clinical efficacy in a broad range of coronary artery disease patients, pharmacodynamic studies conducted in patients undergoing stenting showed that clopidogrel therapy was associated with variable and moderate platelet inhibition (50% inhibition at steady state as demonstrated by ex-vivo ADP-induced platelet aggregation) as well. Ticagrelor, a cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine acting as an analog of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), constitutes a first non-thienopyridine direct platelet P2Y12 receptor blocker. Aim of the study: To investigate factors linked to HOTPR on ticagrelor and whether they differ from factors linked to HOTPR on clopidogrel. Materials and methods: Totally 300 patients were included in the study Patients presenting to the Department of Cardiology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Kattangulathur, Veeraraghavan Sriram, Venkatesh Munusamy, Dhandapani Vellala Elumalai. A study on platelet reactivity and associated clinical characteristics in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel. IAIM, 2019; 6(8): 26- 34. Page 27 Kanchipuram District, Chennai with an ACS between January 2018 to May 2019 were eligible for inclusion in the study if coronary angiography (±PCI) was planned and they were adequately pretreated with Ticagrelor or clopidogrel and aspirin. An ACS was defined as symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia lasting > 15 min with either troponin elevation or new electrocardiogram (ECG) changes consistent with myocardial ischemia. ECG changes consistent with myocardial ischemia included ≥ 1 mm of ST-segment deviation or T wave inversion ≥ 1 mm in at least 2 contiguous leads. Troponin was considered elevated if greater than 14 ng/L, with a rise and/or fall of 50% if 14-50 ng/L or 20% if >50 ng/L in a subsequent measure. Results: The mean age was 63 ± 12 years with 71.9% being male and 18% having diabetes. Patients predominantly presented with NSTEMI 76% and 24% as STEMI. Patients treated with Ticagrelor were younger, more likely to be male, less likely to present with STEMI, have suffered a previous MI, experience atrial fibrillation and be taking proton pump inhibitors or calcium channel blockers. Patients who were administered Ticagrelor demonstrated significantly lower platelet reactivity when stimulated with ADP compared to patients administered clopidogrel (30.3 AU vs 43.7 AU respectively, p<0.0001). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that Ticagrelor provides more potent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel measured by MEA. This is reflected in ticagrelor’s ability to reduce the proportion of ACS patients experiencing HOTPR. Different clinical factors contribute to HOTPR in ACS patients treated with Ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Clopidogrel dose, renal insufficiency, clinical presentation, and platelet count are linked to clopidogrel HOTPR. In contrast, only a history of myocardial infarction is associated with Ticagrelor HOTPR.

2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-187177

ABSTRACT

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the number one cause of death worldwide. In India almost 30,000 people suffer an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) each year and, despite the greatly improved survival after AMI, CVD remains the leading cause of death among women and men. During the last decade, there has been increasing awareness of the significant minority of patients with acute myocardial infarction, for whom invasive coronary angiography (ICA) does not show any coronary artery stenoses. This condition is called myocardial infarction and non-obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA) and is still incompletely understood. Aim of the study: To investigate whether patients with MINOCA had a greater coronary plaque burden determined by coronary CTA than a control group matched by age and gender. Materials and methods: Totally 100 patients were included in the study Patients presenting to the department of cardiology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Institute Kattangulathur, Kanchipuram District, Chennai with an ACS between January 2018 to May 2019. In the first step, patients with MINOCA were screened for the SMINC study Patients were eligible to take part in the study if they were between 35 and 70 years old, fulfilled the criteria for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) according to the universal definition of AMI and underwent ICA showing no or minimal signs Venkatesh Munusamy, Veeraraghavan Sriram, Dhandapani Vellala Elumalai. Coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructed coronary arteries. IAIM, 2019; 6(8): 18-25. Page 19 of atherosclerosis (defined as the presence of plaque discernible on ICA, but no stenosis exceeding 30% by visual estimation). All patients also underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging at a median of 12 days after hospital admission. Results: MINOCA patients did not have more CAD than healthy controls, matched by age and gender. A large proportion of MINOCA patients had no signs of CAD at coronary CTA. Conclusion: Thus, MINOCA should not be considered a definitive diagnosis, but rather a working diagnosis, warranting additional diagnostic evaluation. Myocarditis is one of the conditions that may manifest itself as MINOCA. Findings of the SMINC study, where myocarditis was excluded by CMR, suggest that TS is an important cause of MINOCA. Other potential causes include CAD with rupture of a non-stenotic lesion, coronary artery spasm, thrombotic disorders, and microvascular dysfunction.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL